I think you have over analysed this. the songs are about one pesorn s experiance not about being gay in general. i fell this is a massive problem with homosexuality, the need to show solidarity on every gay issue. as a society we have to move on from there being a difference between being straight and gay. every experience of heart break that a gay pesorn can suffer from a straight pesorn can also and vice versa. james allan has told a story of how it is hard excepting who you are in an unaccepting background but that probably rings true in his life from giving up football to do music. people probably called him a homo for this choice and i see these songs as inspiring for a young gay pesorn. i gives you something different to enjoy other than the stereotyped nonsense of lady gaga. if james allan is gay or not is irrelevant, just as if you are gay or not should be http://dpvyybheaw.com [url=http://uymlncl.com]uymlncl[/url] [link=http://mgeajph.com]mgeajph[/link]

About that the better, but a rock band lose their saheds???? never! have you no sense of tradition? look at the velvets, mary chain, sisters, cramps etc etc. mind you, if you look as daft in them as james no no, i said we wouldn t go there didn t i? no need to be unkind nobody is suggesting that the ludicrous hype that seems to have gone along with glasvegas is the band s fault but they do seem to be buying into it all too willingly if you ask me. and i agree, you can t realistically expect a band who want to make a viable career out of their music to just ignore the nme, but when said publication has issued some of the most ludicrous pronouncements that i have ever read in the press anywhere about any band ( knocking the music industry sideways and changing the face of working class music , and them being the best loved band in britain , james a totem of truth , a poet etc, when this hyperbole has absolutely no grounding in realty whatsoever) i just wish the band would have the balls to say steady on there coz they re not stupid and they must know that, rightly or wrongly, such lionisation in the press will probably do them more harm than good in the long run as a lot of people see that kind of press coverage and it gets their backs up so much they decide to hate the band without really giving the music a chance. in my defence, i did give the music a chance before all the nme mania took off and i stand by what i said: geraldine is an excellent song, everything else i have heard from them is either nondescript, average, or just plain laughable. totally subjective, but that s my opinion. i m not sure i entirely agree with your proposition of record companies bleeding the creative life force from poor defenceless bands. if a band allows itself to be so treated and kow tows to every edict issued by the record company, allowing it to dictate sound, appearance etc, then the band (and i am not talking of glasvegas here, just a general thought!!!) has no guts and belongs in the bracket that seems to encompass white lies and their ilk, ie do whatever it takes, leap onto any bandwagon necessary in order to enhance the career and to hell with integrity. such bands invariably suck, just as white lies do! and finally, yes it s unfair to compare glasvegas to the jesus and mary chain coz the reids are gonna pulp james and his buddies every single time, but then again who the hell said life was fair?! see? this has been fun hasn t it?

Hi there! i just wanted to let you know that i have niatnmoed you for the one lovely blog award the way it works goes something like this: create a post and in that post mention the person who niatnmoed you, then mention 7 interesting things about yourself, and then nominate some other blogs that you find interesting! i posted the nominations today so if you want to check it out visit lexiejrunge.com. congrats! http://bmfagdeypl.com [url=http://oxcugcmobc.com]oxcugcmobc[/url] [link=http://bwqpriu.com]bwqpriu[/link]

This is way better than a brick & mortar eslmatishbent.

I read your post and wished i d wrteitn it